[antir-heralds] Name Check: Lucia Magnus
Ursula Whitcher
ursula at math.washington.edu
Tue Apr 17 18:33:55 EDT 2007
> The only problem I can see is with Lucius-as-nomen. The Laurel site
> (http://www.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/names/roman/names.html) only list Lucius as
> a praenomen, which agrees with my (scanty) reading anent Republic/early Imperial
> Rome.
Oh, sorry, I should have caught that.
> As pointed out in http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/roman_names.html, by the late
> Republic, women's names were changing somewhat, but in no case was the father's
> praenomen used. The above-referenced St. Gabriel report, referring to even later
> times, makes clear the praenomina were pretty much gone, which I would expect
> means Lucius (and hence Lucia) were gone, too.
You'll note that the Saint Gabriel report 2842 describes <Lucius> as a
nomen, not as a praenomen. I think that means that it had been adopted
as a nomen sometime after the time of the Republic-- I'll ask the
Academy to clarify. (I wrote the letter, but I didn't do all of the
research, and the Academy archives for the letter aren't available at
the moment.)
Ursula Georges.
More information about the antir-heralds
mailing list