[antir-heralds] cc: Argent, a frog azure within a bordure sable

Nancy Carr Zupanic bear_necessities at telus.net
Thu May 10 01:11:19 EDT 2007


> However, X.2 reads (in part) "Simple armory does not conflict with other
> simple armory if the type of every primary charge is *!substantially!*
> changed" (emphasis added). Since the frog and the turtle are both the same
> tincture and the same posture, I would think X.2 does not apply. If so,
> then the problem you cited (that there's at most 1 CD) comes up, and the
> proposed device conflicts.

Ahhh, a thinker!  You are very observant.  But, (thankfully in this case), 
X.2 refers to a substantial difference between charges, i.e.. turtle vs. 
frog, the tincture and posture being outside of that equation.  So, we're 
okay there.

Thanks so much to all of you who weighed in on this and double-checked for 
me!  I very much appreciate it.

Doireann 



More information about the antir-heralds mailing list