[antir-heralds] photo/style check please.

chrisact at qwickconnect.net chrisact at qwickconnect.net
Mon Nov 5 18:30:51 EST 2007


Britt wrote:
> On 11/5/07, mark johnson <templardude2001 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>   
>> Greetings unto the College of Heralds from Thomas, Hazel Leaf. I would like to ask your help with the attached  artwork. The attached is a photo of my clients proposed device. I would like to let you know the bordure does not apply, it is only there for wall hanging purposes.
>>
>>   My own questions are involving the "rising sun/Gyronny"
>>   Using "gyronny" the artwork would have to change, but would it be more stylisticaly correct?
>>     
>
> I put the image up here:
> http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Alienplayer/Heraldry/hhdevice.jpg
>
> There aren't enough gyrons to make that gyronny.  You effectively have
> a gules section of the field with a sable charge and a few argent bits
> that aren't going to help with the color-on-color thing.
> You could have it gyronny from the line of division, assuring that red
> was against the lower half.  Not good style, but for a Norseman now
> really bad, either.
>
> - Teceangl

RfS, VIII.4.a:
"Pictorial Design - Overly pictorial designs may not be registered.
"Design elements should not be combined to create a picture of a scene 
or landscape. For example, combining a field divided per fess wavy azure 
and Or with a sun and three triangles Or, as well as a camel and two 
palm trees proper to depict the Nile Valley would not be acceptable."

IMO, an obvious attempt to depict a ship against a rising/setting sun 
violates this part of the Rules for Submissions. Changing to an actual 
"gyronny from the line of division" would also set off my "no-can-do 
meter," but might be acceptable to Laurel. Gyrrony with a torteau (a 
roundel gules), which is the closest I could blazon the picture, is 
against the rules. Viz. this precedent:
[/Gyronny argent and gules, on a plate .../] ... just as we do not allow 
a compony bordure to share a tincture with the field, the consensus was 
to not allow a roundel to share a tincture with a gyronny field, as the 
number of divisions is not high enough to ensure identifiability. 
[*Sarah MacGregor*, 08/00, R-Meridies]
LoAR Date: August 1, 2000

Further, you cannot have two gyrons that are *not* opposite to each 
other be the same tincture, because *you must have an even number of 
gyrons* in a gyronny (except gyronny of three). Thus, the two gyrons 
touching the line of division (for per fess, per pale, per bend 
[sinister] etc.), must be different tinctures. Thus, the other half of 
the field must be some tincture other than *either* of those used in the 
gyronny. There's a precedent:
[returning /Per fess gyronny gules and Or issuant from the line of 
division and Or/]  The use of a gyronny half of a field which shares a 
tincture with the other half of the field, so that in this case an Or 
gyron is next to the Or half of the field, makes creates a severe 
identifiability problem; it is extremely difficult to figure out just 
what the field division/s is/are.  RfS VII.7.a. requires that "Elements 
must be recognizable solely from their appearance."  To do so here 
requires more time and effort than is consistent with the general 
principles of armorial identifiability.  (Stefan Remnaia Palatka, 4/96 
p. 19)
LoAR Date: April 1, 1996

The only way around this I can think of is gyronny of 3 tinctures, and 
I'm not sure if the SCA allows that---other than the four items that are 
gyronny of three 
(http://oanda.sca.org/cgi-bin/oanda_bp.cgi?p=gyronny+of+three), I can 
find no examples of gyronny in three tinctures.

Oh, and regarding sable on a gyronny containing gules? This precedent 
applies:
[/Gyronny sable and argent, a wolf statant purpure.../] Even though the 
field is evenly divided of a color and metal, most of the identifying 
parts of the wolf are on sable areas of the field, making the wolf 
unidentifiable. [*Wulfgar Neumann*, 01/01, R-Outlands]
LoAR Date: January 1, 2001

I think the whole idea is very, very questionable. YMMV.


~~Basil Dragonstrike

-- 
Check out my Squidoo page---- http://www.squidoo.com/HEROSystem

Check out my friend's e-shop: t-shirts, books, and more fun stuff!----
http://www.cafepress.com/rowanchisholm

Evil Overlord Rule #216: I will not pick up a glowing ancient artifact and shout "Its power is now mine!!!" Instead I will grab some tongs, transfer it to a hazardous materials container, and transport it back to my lab for study.



More information about the antir-heralds mailing list